<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nigel has left the building&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616</link>
	<description>The greatest storage blog in the world....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616&#038;cpage=1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>I just shut down my blog - too busy these days to make it a full-time thing.The only reason Software is sexy is because the former hardware manufacturers want the fat profit margins that come with software.&#160; (IE once it&#039;s GA you can sell the same thing over and over again)That would be fine if they didn&#039;t skimp on development to increase said fat profit margin.For example.&#160; EMC was king when all it did was hardware.&#160; EMC is losing market-share daily now that they spend more time pushing crappy software products (and &quot;appliances&quot; based on consumer grade PC hardware) over the products that made them what they are.I don&#039;t care how much the EMC Sales dweebs want me to endorse it, RecoverPoint goes into an environment and I go out of it.&#160; It&#039;s as simple as that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just shut down my blog &#8211; too busy these days to make it a full-time thing.The only reason Software is sexy is because the former hardware manufacturers want the fat profit margins that come with software.&nbsp; (IE once it&#8217;s GA you can sell the same thing over and over again)That would be fine if they didn&#8217;t skimp on development to increase said fat profit margin.For example.&nbsp; EMC was king when all it did was hardware.&nbsp; EMC is losing market-share daily now that they spend more time pushing crappy software products (and &quot;appliances&quot; based on consumer grade PC hardware) over the products that made them what they are.I don&#8217;t care how much the EMC Sales dweebs want me to endorse it, RecoverPoint goes into an environment and I go out of it.&nbsp; It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616&#038;cpage=1#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>Storage is but a small piece of the puzzle my friend.&#160; Storage is a commodity now.&#160; Software companies have made it that way, including EMC.&#160; Hardware is cool, but software is sexy. (c)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storage is but a small piece of the puzzle my friend.&nbsp; Storage is a commodity now.&nbsp; Software companies have made it that way, including EMC.&nbsp; Hardware is cool, but software is sexy. (c)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen2615</title>
		<link>http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616&#038;cpage=1#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen2615</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.rupturedmonkey.com/?p=616#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>I would beg to differ about it being a commodity right now.&#160; Having a friend who works as a Business Development Manager for Cisco&#160;who has to&#160;come up with some interesting solutions&#160;and also knowing what large corporations are trying to implement with the data centre and &quot;cloud computing&quot; (or whatever its called tomorrow), storage is by far not just a commodity.&#160; 
Getting the right storage to the right user (on the right &quot;virtualised&quot; plaform) with the right protocol in&#160;the most efficient and cost effective solution needs a good deal of planning and in some cases vision.
Some of the best (I mean seriously big)&#160;paying roles around are for storage (and data) architectural roles that also have to integrate with security and server virtualisation architectural solutions.&#160; Getting the right backup solution for PB&#039;s&#160;of disk is even more difficult.
Perhaps data center infrastructure covers that eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would beg to differ about it being a commodity right now.&nbsp; Having a friend who works as a Business Development Manager for Cisco&nbsp;who has to&nbsp;come up with some interesting solutions&nbsp;and also knowing what large corporations are trying to implement with the data centre and &quot;cloud computing&quot; (or whatever its called tomorrow), storage is by far not just a commodity.&nbsp;<br />
Getting the right storage to the right user (on the right &quot;virtualised&quot; plaform) with the right protocol in&nbsp;the most efficient and cost effective solution needs a good deal of planning and in some cases vision.<br />
Some of the best (I mean seriously big)&nbsp;paying roles around are for storage (and data) architectural roles that also have to integrate with security and server virtualisation architectural solutions.&nbsp; Getting the right backup solution for PB&#8217;s&nbsp;of disk is even more difficult.<br />
Perhaps data center infrastructure covers that eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.450 seconds -->
